Skip to main content

Another Dawkins flaw?

Found the following quote on Richard Dawkins Site and thought I'd counter a few of these points too while I'm at it.

Six Reasons to be an Atheist from The Little Book of Atheist Spirituality by Andre Comte-Sponville
1. The weakness of the opposing arguments, the so-called proofs of God's existence
2. Common experience: If God existed, he should be easier to see or sense.
3. My refusal to explain something I cannot understand by something I understand even less.
4. The enormity of evil.
5. The mediocrity of mankind.
6. Last but not least, the fact that God corresponds so perfectly to our wishes that there is every reason to think he was invented to fulfill them, at least in fantasy; this makes religion an illusion in the Freudian sense of the term.

These are not Dawkins own reasons but they are on his site so here we go:

1. Weakness of an opposing argument should not be cited as a reason to reject God. The theory that the Earth was flat was accepted because this was the argument that made most sense, the weakness of the opposing argument meant that it was rejected. It was only when it was proven to be correct was it accepted. Mankind has been wrong about many things in the past in regards to science and while neither the existence and non-existence of God may ever be proven correct, it would be arrogant and ignorant to rule out the possibility based on the weakness of the counter argument.

2. Science again provides an example where this is plain arrogance. Dark Matter could neither been seen nor sensed only a few years ago and yet today as our instruments of detection have improved we can now sense it. The idea that man has reached some sort of level whereby he somehow can see or sense everything is once again arrogant and ignorant.

3. Surely this is something science does everyday. Psychologists explain human thought and processes in the brain using structures that they themselves admit they do not fully understand. I do admit though that everything in the Universe should be able to be explained simply because I think God created it to follow rules that we are intelligent enough to one day grasp. Does not mean there is no God though.

4. Give me a break! If I could prove that the enormity of good in the world balances the amount of evil would we then say that there is a God?

5. Mankind is mediocre because he has not finished evolving yet but if you follow what some religions state then the mediocrity of mankind is perfected when death moves you beyond the physical form. Why do we think that we are the pinnacle of evolution at this point in our existence. We have so much more to learn and are such a young species that perfection may be a point that can met through further evolution. Perhaps that is what is meant by heaven on Earth. When the species evolves to the point where we are perfect then God will be known to us. Just a thought but at least I'm not giving the impression that mankind is somehow as good as evolution gets.

6. Probably the best argument of the 6 to be honest and also the easiest to refute. If you believe in Christ then it's been 2000 years since God contact mankind directly. In this time we have analysed time and again the words we were left and with our flawed minds we set our own understandings loose on the World. We altered the image to suit ourselves and applied man-made rules to teachings without being told that the rules were right or wrong. This is not proof that God exists or not and is certainly not reason to give up religion it is simply the fact that man alters things to fit with his own understanding. In the same way as we have altered people in history to do many super-human feats they probably never did we altered God to fit with our hopes and dreams. The fundamental rules may be correct just our image may be distorted by time. Doesn't mean he doesn't exist though.


Popular posts from this blog

A Little Time Travel Thought Experiment

During the Back to the Future (BTTF) anniversary celebrations there was a lot of talk about how accurately they represented time travel. The consensus seemed to be that travelling back and appearing at the same physical location but in a different time was how time travel would likely work. This is where I got thinking. The universe is an ever moving beast. Nothing sits still and this leads to some pretty big problems. To start with the Earth rotates on its axis every ~24 hours, so our traveller would need to arrive at approximately the same time of day in the past. He’s worked out time travel so that’s not going to be hard to do. Next, the Earth orbits the sun every ~365.25 days. This one is a little more of a problem. If our traveller is in the heat of June and has decided to travel back because he wants to see an Xmas in the past he’s got a problem. The Earth will be on the other side of the Sun. So Marty needs to travel back to roughly the same day each year? Fair enough I suppos…

Everyone Should Watch Tim Cook’s 2017 MIT Commencement Address

On June 9th 2017, Apple’s CEO Tim Cook took to the stage at MIT and addressed this years graduating class. Throughout the speech you can hear echoes to the address the late Steve Jobs gave to the Stanford class of 2005 but make no mistake this feels like it’s personal and coming from the heart and to me it was brilliant. I cannot recommend it enough. If you decide you don’t have time to listen then just take away this one line:

Measure your impact on humanity not in the likes, but the lives you touch; not in popularity, but in the people you serve. - Tim Cook 2017

Tim strikes the perfect balance between hope, caution and responsibility. Your role in this world is to find how you can best serve humanity. Don’t let the negative voices, no matter where they come from, divert you from doing what you believe to be right and don’t let yourself become one of those voices. Sticking to your values and making the world better for everyone is not easy and is not going to be easy. Embrace the ch…

WWDC 17 - XCode & Return Of IB #MassivePunt

There's no shortage of predictions and leaks around what Apple will announce at WWDC tomorrow. I'm going to add one more.

Since this is the developers conference and iPad seems to be getting a renewed focus I'm going to predict/hope for XCode on iOS. I don't expect something that's as powerful as the Mac version but I'm thinking a Swift code editor and potentially the return of Interface Builder. Being able to lay UI elements out on an actual iPhone and iPad screen would be fantastic. Checkout your code onto iPad, do some changes and submit it to your CI workflow for building etc would be very powerful.